On
Teachers
Ancient scholars had to have
teachers, who would pass on the Tao, teach them a profession, and dispel their
ignorance. As men are not born wise, who can be free from ignorance? If men,
being ignorant, do not seek after teachers, they will certainly remain ignorant
for ever. Those who were born before me certainly have learned the Tao before
me; I should therefor learn from them as my teachers. Those who were born after
me may have learned the Tao before me; I should also learn from them as my
teachers. As I learn the Tao, I need not ask whether my teacher is my senior or
junior. Whether he is noble or common, older or younger, whoever knows the Tao
can be a teacher.
Ah! Since men have long ceased
learning from teachers, it is hard to expect them not to be ignorant. The
ancient sages were far superior to common men, but they still sought learning
from teachers. Men of today are far inferior to those sages, but they think it
shameful to learn from teachers. This is why sages become more sage, while
fools become more foolish. Is this the reason why some become sages and others
fools? A man who loves his son selects a teacher for him, but considers it
shameful to find one for himself. He is indeed ignorant. If a child’s teacher
merely gives him a book and tells him how to read it, this is not the teacher I
have in mind who passes on the Tao and dispels ignorance. If one learns from a
teacher merely to read but not to dispel one’s ignorance, one learns the lesser
and gives up the greater; I do not think that such a man is intelligent.
Sorcerers, physicians, musicians, and artisans are not ashamed to learn from their
teachers. If men of the intelligent class apply to themselves the expression of
“teacher” and “pupil,” people will flock to laugh at them. If they are asked
why, they will reply that these men are equal in age as well as in the Tao. If their
teacher is of a lower rank, they are considered to be disgraced; if their
teacher is of high position, they are considered to be flattering him. Ah! That
the way of learning from a teacher cannot be recovered is now self-evident.
Sorcerers, physicians, musicians, and artisans are usually despised by
gentlemen, but the intelligence of the latter cannot be up to that of the
former; is this not strange?
A sage has no constant teacher.
Thus Confucius learned from teachers such as Yen Tzu, Chang Hung, Shih Hsiang,
and Lao Tan, who were inferior to Confucius. Confucius said, “When walking in a
party of three, there must be one who can teach me.” Therefore, pupils are not
necessarily inferior to their teachers, nor are teachers necessarily better
than their pupils. Some learn the Tao earlier than others, and some have special
skills and others not—that is all.
Pan, son of the Li family,
seventeen years old, is fond of ancient literature and is well versed in the
six arts, the classics and commentaries, not confining himself to what is in
vogue at present. He comes to study with me. As I praise him for carrying out
the ancient Tao, I am writing this essay on teachers for him.
(Ch’u Chai and Winberg
Chai 译) |
|部落|Archiver|英文巴士 ( 渝ICP备10012431号-2 )
GMT+8, 2016-10-5 12:14 , Processed in 0.081112 second(s), 10 queries , Gzip On, Redis On.